![]() Both completely dominate the M2 Ultra, but once again, there's a huge power disparity here. Obviously the crown goes to the absolutely monstrous GeForce RTX 4090, but AMD's top-end card puts up a reasonable showing for itself too. On the GPU compute side of things, the situation is worse, although it must be stated that many of these discrete GPUs will draw more power than the entire M2 Ultra SoC itself. Meanwhile, the M2 Ultra's multi-core score-much more heavily-influenced by memory bandwidth on Geekbench 6 compared to previous versions of the benchmark-just barely creaks ahead of AMD's finest while falling well short of an Intel machine with fast RAM. In particular, the single-threaded score falls behind Zen 4 and Raptor Lake processors, and even the last-gen Core i9-12900KS. However, it certainly doesn't clear the field the way Apple would have you think it does. It hangs with the best from AMD and Intel, and that's nothing to sneeze at. The M2 Ultra comports itself pretty well in both single- and multi-threaded tests. As it usually goes with Geekbench, you have to be careful when picking results, as there's no way to tell which systems were overheating, limited by background software, or overclocked-although that last point isn't a concern for the Apple silicon systems in our lineup here. Peering into the Geekbench 6 database, we can see numerous results for the M2 Ultra. The M2 Max is also playable at 2024 x 1964 at 34 fps.Benchmark data sourced from PrimateLabs Geekbench 6 Browser. Keep in mind that this is an older game, and not one designed for Apple Silicon or Metal. In Rise of the Tomb Raider, the Max shows its might with the highest frame rate at 1920 x 1200. Of course, battery life is going to depend on what you're doing with the device. On battery life, it appears the M2 Pro-based machine is on par with the 2021 model, while the M2 Max machine took a surprising dive. We're hoping to get our hands on the hardware soon to see what we can learn about it. It's also possible that, because the M2 Max has so much going on on the chip, it may have been hampered slightly in multi-core when those GPU cores weren't being used. While the M2 Max's 64GB of RAM should be helping a bit, these may be within standard error. My thoughts are that these scores are pretty close, and Apple should be using the same CPU cores here. I was initially surprised to see that these chips produced the scores they did in Geekbench 5, with the M2 Pro slightly ahead of the M2 Max. The other big difference is the GPU: The M2 Pro has a 19-core GPU, while the M2 Max has a 38-core GPU. The two CPUs both have 12 cores, but the M2 Pro has 32GB of RAM and the M2 Max has 64GB. The performance scores those sites have published are fascinating. MacBook Pro 14-inch, M1 Pro, (8-core CPU, 14-core GPU, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD) MacBook Pro 16-inch, M1 Max (10-core CPU, 32-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD) MacBook Pro 14-inch M2 Max (12-core CPU, 38-core GPU, 64GB RAM, 2TB of SSD) MacBook Pro 14-inch, M2 Pro (12-core CPU, 19-core GPU, 32GB RAM, 2TB SSD) We've collated some scores from our sister sites Laptop Mag and Tom's Guide, as well as some of our prior review data on the 2021 models. It starts with a 12-core CPU and 30-core GPU, and the upgrade nets you a 38-core GPU. The M2 Max is only in the laptops: the 14 and 16-inch MacBook Pros. Some reviewers saw the M2 Pro in the laptop, while others saw it in the Mac Mini. The 16-core neural engine is the same across both chips. The base model has a 10-core CPU and 16-core GPU, but most of the reviews out there have a step up: the full 12-core CPU and 19-core GPU. The M2 Pro can be found in all three of Apple's new computers: the Mac Mini, 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros. The general consensus seems to be that the new chips bring some solid performance upgrades, especially for those looking to upgrade from older Intel-based systems. That's not to say the new system's designs aren't important - I own an M1 Pro MacBook Pro and like it very much, minus the notch - but we're focusing on what's been changed and improved. We're particularly interested in two things: performance and battery life. While we still hope to get our hands on the new processors to run them through their paces, we're pouring over the existing results to see what reviewers think of the new chips. The design of the machines are effectively the same (minus some port changes on the Mac Mini), so the big changes are all in the silicon. The first reviews of Apple's refreshed MacBook Pro and Mac Mini are here, and, with them, we're getting to see impressions of Apple's new M2 Pro and M2 Max processors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |